top of page

BLOG

The Handshake Deal That Ruins Summer: Why Oral Business Agreements Fall Apart in New Jersey Court

  • Writer: Peter Lamont, Esq.
    Peter Lamont, Esq.
  • 2 hours ago
  • 8 min read

Every summer, the same kind of phone call comes into the office. Two friends started a business together two years ago on a handshake. They split things "fifty fifty," meaning that nothing about the split was ever written down. The business is doing well, or it is struggling, or one partner has stopped showing up. Now one of them wants out, or both of them want to change the deal, and the conversation that should have happened on day one is finally happening, only now there are clients, employees, debts, equipment, and a lot of hurt feelings in the mix.


These calls are almost always about oral contracts in New Jersey. They are about deals that everyone meant in good faith, that worked fine while the business was small, and that fell apart the moment the stakes got higher. New Jersey law does enforce some oral agreements, and it refuses to enforce others, and the line between the two is not always where business owners assume it is. Below is a practical guide to where oral contracts hold up, where they fail, and what every Bergen County business owner should do this summer to make sure their handshake does not become next year's lawsuit.


The Short Answer: Are Oral Contracts in New Jersey Enforceable? Yes and No


New Jersey, like most states, will enforce an oral contract as long as the basic elements of contract formation are present and the agreement does not fall within a category that the law requires to be in writing. The basic elements are offer, acceptance, consideration, and reasonably definite terms. If two parties agreed on the essential terms and intended to be bound, a New Jersey court can enforce that agreement even without a signed document.


That is the part of the answer that gets people in trouble. They hear "oral contracts are enforceable" and they think the conversation is over. It is not. The problem is rarely whether the agreement is theoretically enforceable. The problem is whether you can prove what was actually agreed when the other side now remembers things differently. Without a written contract, a litigation between former partners or contracting parties often becomes a swearing contest, and swearing contests are expensive, unpredictable, and exhausting for everyone involved.


The New Jersey Statute of Frauds: Categories That Must Be in Writing


The statute of frauds is the legal rule that requires certain kinds of agreements to be in writing to be enforceable. New Jersey's statute of frauds is found at N.J.S.A. 25:1-1 et seq., and it covers categories of contracts that the legislature decided are too important, or too prone to fraud, to be left to memory.


Among the categories that must be in writing in New Jersey are agreements that cannot be performed within one year, contracts for the sale of real estate or any interest in real estate, agreements to pay the debt of another person, and certain real estate brokerage agreements. The Uniform Commercial Code, adopted in New Jersey at N.J.S.A. 12A:2-201, separately requires contracts for the sale of goods worth five hundred dollars or more to be evidenced by a writing.


If your agreement falls into any of these categories and there is no signed writing, a New Jersey court will generally refuse to enforce it. There are exceptions, including partial performance and certain forms of detrimental reliance, but those exceptions are narrow and require specific facts. Treating them as a backup plan is a losing strategy. The right way to handle a statute of frauds category is to put the agreement in writing on day one.


Partnership Disputes: The Number One Source of Handshake Litigation


If I had to identify the single most common type of handshake dispute that lands in our office, it would be the partnership dispute in New Jersey where two people went into business together without ever signing a partnership agreement or an operating agreement for their LLC. They formed the entity, they started doing business, they each contributed time and money, and they never wrote down what would happen if one of them left, died, became disabled, wanted to bring in a new partner, or simply changed their mind.


When that day comes, the law fills in the blanks for them, and the answers the law provides are almost never the answers either partner would have chosen on day one. The New Jersey Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act and the New Jersey Uniform Partnership Act provide default rules for ownership percentages, distributions, management authority, dissolution, and winding up. Those defaults exist precisely because so many businesses are formed without proper documents. They are blunt rules designed to cover every business, which means they fit no individual business particularly well.


A proper partnership agreement or operating agreement addresses ownership percentages, capital contributions, distributions, management and decision making authority, buyout rights, dispute resolution, restrictive covenants, and dissolution mechanics. Without those terms in writing, every one of those issues becomes a possible lawsuit when the partners disagree. With them in writing, most disputes resolve in a conversation between lawyers in a single afternoon. The difference in cost is staggering.


Cash Flow Slowdowns and the Stress Test on Oral Deals


Summer in New Jersey is a cash flow stress test for many businesses. Construction companies are at peak workload but also at peak payroll. Restaurants in the shore counties are making most of their annual revenue in twelve weeks. Service businesses tied to school calendars often see a midsummer dip. When cash flow gets tight, undocumented deals between business partners, between business owners and key employees, and between businesses and major vendors come under pressure.


The owner who promised her general manager an equity stake "down the road" gets pressed for a written commitment. The partner who was supposed to "match" the other partner's investment runs short and starts negotiating. The vendor who was promised exclusive supplier rights "for as long as we work together" sees those rights ignored when a cheaper supplier shows up.


Each of these scenarios is a classic breach of contract case in waiting. They are also classic examples of where New Jersey courts have to decide what was actually agreed, what the parties' course of dealing reflects, and whether the alleged oral agreement is even enforceable in the first place. Cash flow stress amplifies every weakness in undocumented relationships. The time to fix the documentation is before the stress arrives.


The Statute of Limitations and Why Time Matters


Even when an oral contract is enforceable, the clock is ticking from the moment of breach. Under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1, New Jersey provides a six year statute of limitations for breach of contract claims. That is generally true for both written and oral contracts. After six years, the claim is gone whether the agreement was enforceable or not.


The practical lesson is that letting a disputed deal sit for years rarely improves the situation. Memories fade, witnesses move on, key documents get lost, and the legal deadlines move closer. If you believe a business partner or vendor has breached an oral agreement, the worst thing you can do is wait and hope it sorts itself out. The right move is to document your position in writing, request that the other side confirm or correct it, and consult with a New Jersey business litigation attorney before the limitations period creates additional problems.



What to Do This Summer Instead of Shaking on It


The fix is rarely complicated. A short, well drafted agreement that addresses the essential business terms protects everyone involved and almost always saves money compared to operating on a handshake. For a new business partnership, that means a real operating agreement or partnership agreement. For a vendor relationship, that means a written master services agreement or supply agreement. For an employee compensation promise, that means a written offer letter or compensation agreement.


These documents do not have to be long, and they do not have to anticipate every possible problem. They have to address the essential terms with enough specificity that two people reading them five years from now would reach the same conclusion about what was agreed. That is the standard of a usable contract. Most small business agreements can be drafted or reviewed in a few hours of attorney time, which is a fraction of what even a small dispute will cost to litigate later.


At the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont, we work with business owners across Bergen County and throughout New Jersey to put proper documentation in place before disputes arise, and to enforce agreements when they do. A short consultation in June is far less expensive than a full-blown lawsuit in February.


The handshake culture has its place. It builds trust and signals confidence, and there is nothing wrong with shaking hands at the end of a meeting. But the handshake should not be the contract. The handshake should be the moment you both agree that the lawyers will write it down properly this week. That is the version of doing business that holds up in summer, in winter, and in court.


Contact us today to discuss your business or legal matter. Put our 20+ years of legal experience to work for you.

For detailed insights and legal assistance on topics discussed in this post, including litigation, contact the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont at our Bergen County Office. We're here to answer your questions and provide legal advice. Contact us at (201) 904-2211 or email us at  info@pjlesq.com.


Interested in More Legal Insights?

Explore our range of resources on business and legal matters. Subscribe to our podcast and YouTube channel for a wealth of information covering various business and legal topics. For specific inquiries or to discuss your legal matter with an attorney from our team, please email me directly at pl@pjlesq.com or call at (201) 904-2211. Your questions are important to us, and we look forward to providing the answers you need.

Litigation Attorney Peter Lamont

About Peter J. Lamont, Esq.

Peter J. Lamont is a nationally recognized attorney with significant experience in business, contract, litigation, and real estate law. With over two decades of legal practice, he has represented a wide array of businesses, including large international corporations. Peter is known for his practical legal and business advice, prioritizing efficient and cost-effective solutions for his clients.


Peter has a 10.0 Avvo Rating and has been recognized as one of America's Most Honored Lawyers since 2011. 201 Magazine and Lawyers of Distinction have also recognized him for being one of the top business and litigation attorneys in New Jersey. His commitment to his clients and the legal community is further evidenced by his active role as a speaker, lecturer, and published author in various legal and business publications.


As the founder of the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont, Peter brings his Wall Street experience and client-focused approach to New Jersey, offering personalized legal services tailored to each client's unique needs and goals.

DISCLAIMERS: The contents of this website and post are intended to convey general information only and not to provide legal advice or opinions. The contents of this website and the posting and viewing of the information on this website should not be construed as, and should not be relied upon for, legal or tax advice in any particular circumstance or fact situation. Nothing on this website is an offer to represent you, and nothing on this website is intended to create an attorney‑client relationship. An attorney-client relationship may only be established through direct attorney‑to‑client communication that is confirmed by the execution of an engagement agreement.


As with any legal issue, you must obtain competent legal counsel before making any decisions about how to respond to a subpoena or whether to challenge one, even if you believe that compliance is not required. Because each situation is different, it may be impossible for this article to address all issues raised by every situation encountered in responding to a subpoena. The information below can give you guidance regarding some common issues related to subpoenas, but you should consult with an attorney before taking any actions (or refraining from acts) based on these suggestions. This post will also focus on New Jersey law. If you receive a subpoena in a state other than New Jersey, you should immediately seek the advice of an attorney in your state, as certain rules differ in other states.


Disclaimer: Recognition by Legal Awards

The legal awards and recognitions mentioned above do not constitute an endorsement or guarantee of future performance. These honors reflect an attorney's past achievements and should not be considered as predictors of future results. They are not intended to compare one lawyer's services with those of other lawyers. The process for selecting an attorney for these awards can vary and may not include a review of the lawyer's competence in specific areas of practice. Potential clients should perform their own evaluation when seeking legal representation. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page