top of page
AdobeStock_137636471.jpeg

BLOG

  • Writer's picturePeter Lamont, Esq.

Prevailing Party Clauses in Contracts: What You Need to Know

Updated: Apr 13, 2023

A prevailing party clause is a provision in a contract that specifies which party will be responsible for paying the legal fees and costs if there is a dispute between the parties and the matter goes to court. The goal of these clauses is to incentivize parties to resolve disputes without resorting to legal action, as the party that ultimately prevails in a lawsuit will be responsible for paying the costs of that lawsuit.

How Prevailing Party Clauses Work

When a dispute arises between parties to a contract, the prevailing party clause can come into play. This clause specifies which party will be responsible for paying the legal fees and costs incurred by the other party if the matter goes to court. The party that prevails in the legal dispute will be responsible for paying the legal fees and costs of the losing party, as specified in the contract.


The purpose of these clauses is to encourage parties to resolve disputes through negotiation rather than through the legal system. By making one party responsible for paying the legal fees and costs of the other, the prevailing party clause creates a financial disincentive for parties to litigate disputes. This can help to keep the costs of disputes low and minimize the time and resources spent resolving disputes.


Benefits of Prevailing Party Clauses

There are several benefits to including a prevailing party clause in a contract. Firstly, these clauses can help to reduce the costs associated with resolving disputes, as parties are less likely to litigate if they know that they will be responsible for paying the legal fees and costs of the other party.


Additionally, prevailing party clauses can help to clarify the rights and responsibilities of each party in the event of a dispute. This can help to avoid confusion and reduce the chances of disputes arising in the first place. By specifying which party will be responsible for paying the legal fees and costs of the other party in the event of a dispute, prevailing party clauses can help to ensure that parties are aware of the potential costs associated with litigation.


Finally, prevailing party clauses can provide additional protection for both parties. The clause helps to ensure that each party will bear its own costs if a dispute arises and that neither party will be forced to bear the costs of the other party’s legal action. This can help to protect both parties from financial hardship in the event of a dispute.


Downside of Prevailing Party Clauses

Although prevailing party clauses can provide many benefits to both parties involved in a contract, there are also some potential drawbacks. For example, these clauses may encourage parties to engage in litigation rather than negotiation if they believe that they have a good chance of winning the legal dispute and having their costs covered by the other party. This could lead to an increase in costly litigation and ultimately result in higher legal fees for both parties. Additionally, these clauses can be difficult to enforce as it is often difficult to determine which party was actually responsible for paying the legal fees and costs associated with a dispute. Finally, prevailing party clauses can be seen as unfair or one-sided if one party has significantly more financial resources than another, as this would give them an advantage when it comes time to pay the legal fees and costs associated with a dispute.


Example of Prevailing Party Clause

"In the event of any legal action arising from or relating to this contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with such action."


As explained above, this clause specifies that if there is a legal dispute between the parties and the matter goes to court, the party that prevails in the legal dispute will be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with the lawsuit. The goal of this clause is to incentivize parties to resolve disputes without resorting to legal action, as the party that ultimately prevails in a lawsuit will be responsible for paying the costs of that lawsuit.


The Elements of a Contract: What You Need to Know

A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties that sets out the terms and conditions of their relationship. To be enforceable, a contract must contain several essential elements, including offer, acceptance, consideration, and mutual agreement.

  1. Offer: A contract must start with an offer made by one party to the other. The offer must be clear and unambiguous, setting out the terms and conditions of the agreement in a way that can be understood by the recipient.

  2. Acceptance: The recipient of the offer must then accept the offer by communicating their agreement to the terms and conditions set out in the offer. The acceptance must be unconditional and must mirror the terms of the offer.

  3. Consideration: Consideration refers to the exchange of something of value between the parties. This could be money, goods, services, or a promise to do something. Consideration must be present for a contract to be enforceable.

  4. Mutual Agreement: The parties must agree to all the terms and conditions of the contract. This agreement must be expressed or implied, and must be mutual, meaning that both parties are bound by the same terms and conditions.

  5. Capacity: Both parties must have the legal capacity to enter into the contract. This means that they must be of legal age and must not be under any legal disability, such as mental incapacity or bankruptcy.

  6. Legality: The contract must be legal and must not violate any laws or public policies. Contracts that are illegal or contrary to public policy are unenforceable.

  7. Written Contract: While an oral contract can be enforceable, it is often advisable to have a written contract, as it provides a clear and definitive record of the terms and conditions of the agreement.

Conclusion

Prevailing party clauses can be a useful tool in protecting yourself against expensive legal battles and incentivizing parties to resolve disputes without resorting to litigation. However, these types of clauses are not for everyone, as they have their limitations and drawbacks that must be taken into account. If you're considering including one in your contract agreement, it's always best practice to speak with an experienced attorney who can help you understand the full implications of such a clause and ensure that all elements necessary for enforceability are present.



Do you have questions about contract law or other legal issues? If so, contact us Today at our Bergen County Office. Call Us at (201) 904-2211 or email Us at info@pjlesq.com

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

If you would like more information about this post or if you want to discuss your legal matter with an attorney at the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont, please contact me at pl@pjlesq.com or at (201) 904-2211. Don't forget to check out and subscribe to our podcast and YouTube channel. We have hundreds of podcasts and videos concerning a variety of business and legal topics. I look forward to answering any questions that you might have.

DISCLAIMER: The contents of this website and post are intended to convey general information only and not to provide legal advice or opinions. The contents of this website and the posting and viewing of the information on this website should not be construed as, and should not be relied upon for, legal or tax advice in any particular circumstance or fact situation. Nothing on this website is an offer to represent you, and nothing on this website is intended to create an attorney‑client relationship. An attorney-client relationship may only be established through direct attorney‑to‑client communication that is confirmed by the execution of an engagement agreement.


As with any legal issue, it is important that you obtain competent legal counsel before making any decisions about how to respond to a subpoena or whether to challenge one - even if you believe that compliance is not required. Because each situation is different, it may be impossible for this article to address all issues raised by every situation encountered in responding to a subpoena. The information below can give you guidance regarding some common issues related to subpoenas, but you should consult with an attorney before taking any actions (or refraining from acts) based on these suggestions. Separately, this post will focus on New Jersey law. If you receive a subpoena in a state other than New Jersey you should immediately seek the advice of an attorney in your state as certain rules differ in other states.


bottom of page