top of page

BLOG

Understanding Damages In A New Jersey Partnership Dispute

  • Writer: Peter Lamont, Esq.
    Peter Lamont, Esq.
  • 14 hours ago
  • 7 min read
Understanding Damages In A New Jersey Partnership Dispute

Understanding Damages In A New Jersey Partnership Dispute


What a Wronged Partner May Be Entitled to Recover

Partnership disputes can be among the most financially and emotionally charged forms of commercial litigation. Whether the issue arises from a breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of funds, failure to share profits, or improper expulsion of a partner, the central question in most cases becomes the same: what losses can be recovered, and how are those damages calculated? While many partnership disputes involve equitable relief, such as judicial dissolution or accounting, the pursuit of monetary damages is often at the heart of the case.


New Jersey law does not provide a one-size-fits-all formula for damages in partnership disputes. Instead, the type and measure of damages available to a partner will depend on the specific allegations, the structure of the partnership, and the provisions of any written agreement. Nonetheless, there are recognized categories of compensable loss that courts routinely examine in partnership litigation.


Lost Profits and Distributions

One of the most common forms of damages in a partnership dispute is the recovery of unpaid or misappropriated profits. Partners are generally entitled to share in the business's profits according to the terms of the partnership agreement. In the absence of a written agreement, New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act provides that profits are to be divided equally among the partners.


If one partner diverts business opportunities, withholds profits, or fails to distribute earnings in accordance with the agreement or statute, the aggrieved partner may seek to recover their rightful share. The plaintiff must establish the amount of profit that was earned and demonstrate that they were entitled to a portion of it. This often requires access to financial records, bank statements, tax returns, and, in some cases, forensic accounting.


The calculation of lost profits or distributions may also include interest or other adjustments based on payment delays. In cases where one partner has wrongfully excluded another from the business, the excluded partner may be entitled to disgorgement, a remedy that forces the wrongdoer to surrender the profits they improperly retained.


Compensation for Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Partners in New Jersey owe each other a heightened level of trust, loyalty, and disclosure. These fiduciary duties include the duty of good faith, the duty of loyalty, the duty to refrain from self-dealing, and the duty to fully disclose material facts affecting the partnership. When a partner violates these duties, they may be held liable for the harm caused by their misconduct.


Damages for breach of fiduciary duty may include not only compensatory losses, such as lost profits, but also equitable remedies such as constructive trusts, accounting, or the unwinding of improper transactions. A court may award damages equal to the financial benefit improperly obtained by the breaching partner, regardless of whether the partnership as a whole suffered a direct loss.


For example, if a partner secretly negotiates a side deal with a client or vendor and personally profits from the transaction without disclosure, the injured partner may be entitled to recover the amount that was wrongfully taken, even if the business did not show an overall loss. Courts may also consider whether the breach affected the partnership’s value, reputation, or ongoing business relationships.


Reimbursement of Capital Contributions

In some cases, a partner may be entitled to recover their initial capital contributions or additional investments made during the course of the business. This typically arises where the partnership dissolves or where one partner is expelled without proper process or justification.


New Jersey courts will examine the financial structure of the partnership and the source of the contributions. If the expelled partner can show that their funds were used to finance business operations, purchase equipment, or otherwise advance the enterprise, and if they were not repaid or offset by prior distributions, they may be entitled to reimbursement. Documentation is critical. Bank records, promissory notes, internal ledgers, and partnership agreements will all be used to evaluate the claim.


Valuation of Ownership Interest

If the partnership is being dissolved or one partner is being bought out, a key component of damages will involve the valuation of the partner’s ownership interest. This is typically determined as of the date of dissociation, dissolution, or breach. New Jersey courts may consider a number of valuation methods, including book value, fair market value, or a multiple of earnings, depending on the type of business and the terms of any governing agreement.


Valuation often requires expert testimony, especially in closely held businesses where the value is not easily ascertained. Disputes frequently arise over goodwill, intellectual property, customer relationships, and other intangible assets. The goal is to establish a fair and supportable number that reflects the true value of the departing partner’s stake in the business.


Punitive Damages in Limited Circumstances

While punitive damages are not typically awarded in commercial disputes, they may be available where the wrongful conduct rises to the level of willful misconduct, fraud, or malice. For example, if a partner falsifies documents, embezzles funds, or intentionally destroys partnership assets, a court may award punitive damages to deter similar misconduct and punish the wrongdoer. Such awards are rare and require a heightened evidentiary showing under New Jersey law.


Attorneys’ Fees and Equitable Relief

Although attorneys’ fees are not recoverable as damages in most civil actions, they may be awarded in partnership disputes where the partnership agreement includes a fee-shifting provision or where the plaintiff prevails on certain statutory claims. Courts may also grant equitable relief, such as an injunction to prevent ongoing harm, an order for an accounting of partnership records, or judicial dissolution of the business. These remedies are often pursued in conjunction with claims for monetary damages.


Calculating Damages Requires Precise, Well-Supported Evidence

In every partnership dispute, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving damages with specificity. Courts are not permitted to speculate or guess. Unsupported estimates of lost income or vague allegations of financial harm will not suffice. Damages must be proven with documentation, testimony, and credible financial analysis.


Plaintiffs must also consider mitigation. If a partner suffers harm but fails to take reasonable steps to protect their interest—such as continuing to accept distributions without objection or failing to seek records or relief when problems first arise—their recovery may be reduced or denied.


Conclusion: A Careful, Evidence-Driven Approach Is Essential

The recovery of damages in a partnership dispute is not automatic. It requires a disciplined, evidence-based approach that aligns with legal standards and the business realities of the partnership. Whether the issue involves lost profits, return of capital, fiduciary breaches, or valuation of ownership interests, damages must be proven through careful analysis and credible support.


For business owners, the best protection is clear documentation, regular access to financial records, and a written partnership agreement that addresses ownership percentages, profit distributions, dispute resolution, and exit strategies. For litigants, success often depends on how well the damages are presented, not just that something went wrong, but exactly how that wrong translated into financial loss.


For more information about your legal rights or to schedule a consultation, please contact the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont at www.pjlesq.com, call 201-904-2211, or email info@pjlesq.com.

Contact us today to discuss your business or legal matter. Put our 20+ years of legal experience to work for you.

For detailed insights and legal assistance on topics discussed in this post, including litigation, contact the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont at our Bergen County Office. We're here to answer your questions and provide legal advice. Contact us at (201) 904-2211 or email us at  info@pjlesq.com.


Interested in More Legal Insights?

Explore our range of resources on business and legal matters. Subscribe to our podcast and YouTube channel for a wealth of information covering various business and legal topics. For specific inquiries or to discuss your legal matter with an attorney from our team, please email me directly at pl@pjlesq.com or call at (201) 904-2211. Your questions are important to us, and we look forward to providing the answers you need.

Litigation Attorney Peter Lamont

About Peter J. Lamont, Esq.

Peter J. Lamont is a nationally recognized attorney with significant experience in business, contract, litigation, and real estate law. With over two decades of legal practice, he has represented a wide array of businesses, including large international corporations. Peter is known for his practical legal and business advice, prioritizing efficient and cost-effective solutions for his clients.


Peter has an Avvo 10.0 Rating and has been acknowledged as one of America's Most Honored Lawyers since 2011. 201 Magazine and Lawyers of Distinction have also recognized him for being one of the top business and litigation attorneys in New Jersey. His commitment to his clients and the legal community is further evidenced by his active role as a speaker, lecturer, and published author in various legal and business publications.


As the founder of the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont, Peter brings his Wall Street experience and client-focused approach to New Jersey, offering personalized legal services that align with each client's unique needs and goals​.

DISCLAIMERS: The contents of this website and post are intended to convey general information only and not to provide legal advice or opinions. The contents of this website and the posting and viewing of the information on this website should not be construed as, and should not be relied upon for, legal or tax advice in any particular circumstance or fact situation. Nothing on this website is an offer to represent you, and nothing on this website is intended to create an attorney‑client relationship. An attorney-client relationship may only be established through direct attorney‑to‑client communication that is confirmed by the execution of an engagement agreement.


As with any legal issue, it is important that you obtain competent legal counsel before making any decisions about how to respond to a subpoena or whether to challenge one, even if you believe that compliance is not required. Because each situation is different, it may be impossible for this article to address all issues raised by every situation encountered in responding to a subpoena. The information below can give you guidance regarding some common issues related to subpoenas, but you should consult with an attorney before taking any actions (or refraining from acts) based on these suggestions. This post will also focus on New Jersey law. If you receive a subpoena in a state other than New Jersey, you should immediately seek the advice of an attorney in your state, as certain rules differ in other states.


Disclaimer: Recognition by Legal Awards

The legal awards and recognitions mentioned above do not constitute an endorsement or guarantee of future performance. These honors reflect an attorney's past achievements and should not be considered as predictors of future results. They are not intended to compare one lawyer's services with those of other lawyers. The process for selecting an attorney for these awards can vary and may not include a review of the lawyer's competence in specific areas of practice. Potential clients should perform their own evaluation when seeking legal representation. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.


bottom of page