top of page

BLOG

Writer's picturePeter Lamont, Esq.

Understanding Defamation Under New Jersey Law

Updated: Nov 12

Understanding Defamation Under New Jersey Law

Understanding Defamation Under New Jersey Law


Defamation is a legal claim involving a false statement made about someone that harms their reputation. In New Jersey, defamation encompasses two main categories: libel (written defamation) and slander (spoken defamation). However, not every harmful statement qualifies as defamation. New Jersey law provides several protections, especially in contexts like litigation and court procedures, where certain statements are “privileged” and thus immune from defamation claims.


Defining Defamation, Libel, and Slander

Under New Jersey law, defamation involves a false statement about an individual that damages their reputation. To prove defamation, a plaintiff must show that:


  1. A false statement was made about them;

  2. The statement was published to a third party (spoken or written);

  3. It was made negligently or with actual malice, depending on the plaintiff’s status (public or private figure); and

  4. It caused harm to the plaintiff’s reputation.

  5. Libel refers to defamation in a fixed, lasting form, such as a newspaper article, blog post, or social media comment.

  6. Slander refers to defamation that is spoken or otherwise transient, like a verbal rumor spread among a group.


Absolute Privilege: Protecting Statements Made in Litigation

One significant exception to defamation liability is absolute privilege, which applies to statements made in specific settings, such as court proceedings. In New Jersey, statements made during litigation, including court filings, pleadings, or spoken words in court, are typically protected by absolute privilege. This privilege means that even if a statement made in these contexts is false and harmful to someone’s reputation, it generally cannot be the basis for a defamation claim.


For example, if a lawyer accuses someone of fraud during a trial, that statement, even if false, is protected by absolute privilege. The rationale behind this rule is to allow participants in legal proceedings—whether they are attorneys, judges, witnesses, or parties—to speak freely without fear of defamation lawsuits, thereby promoting a fair and open judicial process.


Qualified Privilege in Defamation Cases

Outside of court proceedings, New Jersey also recognizes qualified privilege in certain settings, where statements are protected if they are made without malice and in a context where the person has a legitimate interest in making or receiving the information. Qualified privilege applies to situations like employee evaluations or a reference given by an employer about a former employee.


For instance, if an employer provides a reference for a former employee and notes areas where the employee may have struggled, this could potentially harm the former employee’s reputation. However, because the employer is sharing this information in good faith and in a relevant context, it would likely be protected under qualified privilege—unless the employee can prove the statement was made with malice or recklessness.


Truth as a Defense

Another fundamental principle in defamation law is that truth is an absolute defense. If a statement is true, it cannot be defamatory, no matter how damaging it may be to someone’s reputation. For example, if a newspaper reports that a local business owner was convicted of fraud and the conviction is real, the business owner cannot successfully claim defamation because the statement is factual.


Opinion vs. Fact: Statements That Aren’t Considered Defamation

In New Jersey, expressions of opinion generally do not qualify as defamation. For a statement to be defamatory, it must be a false statement of fact, not merely a subjective opinion. Courts differentiate between factual claims (which can be proven true or false) and opinions (which are subjective and often not provable).

For instance, if someone writes, “I think John Doe is a terrible lawyer,” this is an opinion, not a verifiable fact, and thus would not be considered defamatory. However, if someone writes, “John Doe was disbarred for fraud,” and that is false, it could constitute defamation since it is presented as a fact.


Examples Illustrating Defamation and Privileges

To clarify how defamation, privileges, and exceptions work, consider these examples:


  1. Protected Statement in Court: During a trial, a witness testifies that the defendant “stole money” from a company. Even if this is false, it is protected by absolute privilege because it is part of the court proceedings.

  2. Employer Reference: An employer states that a former employee “struggled with meeting deadlines.” If this statement is made without malice and reflects the employer’s honest assessment, it is likely protected by qualified privilege.

  3. Opinion on Social Media: If someone posts on social media, “I think the restaurant down the street has poor service,” this is a subjective opinion and not actionable as defamation.

  4. False Accusation Outside Court: If a business competitor falsely accuses another company owner of embezzlement at a public event, this could be defamatory if it harms the person’s reputation, is untrue, and was made with malice or negligence.


Conclusion: Navigating Defamation Law in New Jersey

Defamation claims in New Jersey require a careful examination of the statements made, the context, and the intent behind them. While individuals have the right to protect their reputation, the law also safeguards open communication, particularly in legal and employment settings, where absolute and qualified privileges often apply.


Whether you are concerned about a potential defamation claim or want to understand your rights regarding statements made about you, it is essential to seek experienced legal guidance to navigate these complexities. The Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont are here to provide guidance on defamation, confidentiality, and reputation protection.

Contact us today to discuss your business or legal matter. Put our 20+ years of legal experience to work for you.

 

For detailed insights and legal assistance on topics discussed in this post, including litigation, contact the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont at our Bergen County Office. We're here to answer your questions and provide legal advice. Contact us at (201) 904-2211 or email us at  info@pjlesq.com.


Interested in More Legal Insights?

Explore our range of resources on business and legal matters. Subscribe to our podcast and YouTube channel for a wealth of information covering various business and legal topics. For specific inquiries or to discuss your legal matter with an attorney from our team, please email me directly at pl@pjlesq.com or call at (201) 904-2211. Your questions are important to us, and we look forward to providing the answers you need.

Litigation Attorney Peter Lamont

About Peter J. Lamont, Esq.

Peter J. Lamont is a nationally recognized attorney with significant experience in business, contract, litigation, and real estate law. With over two decades of legal practice, he has represented a wide array of businesses, including large international corporations. Peter is known for his practical legal and business advice, prioritizing efficient and cost-effective solutions for his clients.


Peter has an Avvo 10.0 Rating and has been acknowledged as one of America's Most Honored Lawyers since 2011. 201 Magainze and Lawyers of Distinction have also recognized him for being one of the top business and litigation attorneys in New Jersey. His commitment to his clients and the legal community is further evidenced by his active role as a speaker, lecturer, and published author in various legal and business publications.


As the founder of the Law Offices of Peter J. Lamont, Peter brings his Wall Street experience and client-focused approach to New Jersey, offering personalized legal services that align with each client's unique needs and goals​.

 

DISCLAIMERS: The contents of this website and post are intended to convey general information only and not to provide legal advice or opinions. The contents of this website and the posting and viewing of the information on this website should not be construed as, and should not be relied upon for, legal or tax advice in any particular circumstance or fact situation. Nothing on this website is an offer to represent you, and nothing on this website is intended to create an attorney‑client relationship. An attorney-client relationship may only be established through direct attorney‑to‑client communication that is confirmed by the execution of an engagement agreement.


As with any legal issue, it is important that you obtain competent legal counsel before making any decisions about how to respond to a subpoena or whether to challenge one - even if you believe that compliance is not required. Because each situation is different, it may be impossible for this article to address all issues raised by every situation encountered in responding to a subpoena. The information below can give you guidance regarding some common issues related to subpoenas, but you should consult with an attorney before taking any actions (or refraining from acts) based on these suggestions. Separately, this post will focus on New Jersey law. If you receive a subpoena in a state other than New Jersey, you should immediately seek the advice of an attorney in your state, as certain rules differ in other states.


Disclaimer: Recognition by Legal Awards

The legal awards and recognitions mentioned above are not an endorsement or a guarantee of future performance. These honors reflect an attorney's past achievements and should not be considered as predictors of future results. They are not intended to compare one lawyer's services with other lawyers' services. The process for selecting an attorney for these awards can vary and may not include a review of the lawyer's competence in specific areas of practice. Potential clients should perform their own evaluation when seeking legal representation. No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.


0 comments

Commentaires

Noté 0 étoile sur 5.
Pas encore de note

Ajouter une note
bottom of page